Employees do not always say out loud that they are overloaded. Why an honest answer can carry a price, and how leaders can create relief without waiting for a confession.
You ask: «How are you doing with the workload at the moment?» The answer: «I'm fine.» A week later you ask again: «Yes, it's okay.» The third time: «Really, everything's fine.»
What do you do? Many leaders now try to ask even better. They look for the right opening. They phrase it more carefully. Perhaps they bring in HR.
But sometimes the problem is not that the question was badly put. It is that an honest answer can be expensive for the other person.
«I'm fine» can mean many things
Of course «I'm fine» can simply mean that everything is fine. A leader should not automatically read something into it. But when observable changes are there at the same time, a closer look is warranted:
- The person regularly works longer hours.
- Tasks are piling up.
- They seem more exhausted than before.
- They are taking on more and more additional topics.
- Mistakes or delays are increasing.
- Recovery seems barely possible any more.
- Colleagues report high strain.
Then a contradiction opens up between what is said and the reality of the work. And that contradiction is interesting. Which warning signs appear earlyis the subject of a separate article.
Why people do not always name overload openly
Performance-oriented people in particular build part of their professional self-image on being reliable. They are the one who gets it done. Who steps in. Who takes responsibility. Who carries the difficult phases too.
Saying «I can't manage this any more» can then feel like something quite different from neutral information. It can feel like: I am not up to my role. I am letting my team down. Everyone else manages. I can no longer take the pressure.
You cannot know from the outside whether a person actually thinks this way. But that is exactly why relief should not depend on someone first having to expose a personal limit.
Relief is also a leadership decision
Imagine a team member who has for months been carrying her actual job, an additional project role, a committee, the onboarding of a new colleague and a weekly report.
You can see it is getting tight. She still says: «I've got this.» Now you can wait until she hands something back herself. Or you can lead. For example like this: «From next week I'm taking you off the committee. The project phase matters more right now.»
No big intervention. No diagnosis. No debate about whether she is «really» overloaded. Just a priority decision.
Not every act of relief needs agreement
That sounds unfamiliar at first. Good leaders want to involve their people, after all. In principle that is right. But prioritising is not the employee's job alone. Leading also means making decisions about work.
When it is clear that five tasks at once cannot sensibly be carried, the answer does not have to be: «Just let me know if it gets too much.» Sometimes it is: «From now on we do four.»
That relieves a person of having to prove first that the strain is bad enough.
What can actually go?
Relief does not always have to be large. Check, for example:
- Meetings: where does this person regularly sit in without their presence being genuinely necessary?
- Reports: which analysis gets produced but is barely used?
- Point-of-contact roles: for which topics has someone automatically become the default person?
- Projects: which initiative actually has lower priority right now?
- Approvals: where can responsibility be distributed differently?
- Administration: which work can be simplified, automated or stopped?
The decisive question is: what can go? Not: what can the person cope with better?
Observe relief instead of interpreting it
When you remove a specific load, watch what happens next. What changes? Does energy come back? Do decisions get easier again? Does concentration improve? Is there more room for initiative?
You should not draw a medical conclusion from this either. But it tells you something about whether workload or the organisation of work may have played a relevant part.
The conversation still matters
Concrete relief does not replace good conversations. On the contrary, it can give them credibility. It makes a difference whether a leader says «Please take good care of yourself» or «I can see a lot is coming together right now. So we're taking two things out of your portfolio. Then we'll look at it again together.»
The second sentence combines care with action. And that is exactly what is often missing: in my survey of 302 employees and leaders across Germany, Austria and Switzerland, 65.9 per cent can raise overload, but only 36.8 per cent see anything actually adjusted afterwards. An overview of the results.
A useful sequence
If you have the impression that someone is under sustained heavy strain:
- Name the observation: «I've noticed you've been carrying a great deal for several weeks now.»
- Ask openly: «How are you experiencing the situation?»
- Listen: do not immediately qualify or fix.
- Check the reality of the work: which tasks, expectations and roles actually rest on this person?
- Prioritise concretely: what gets postponed, stopped or redistributed?
- Look again: what did the change achieve?
This is not therapy. It is leadership.
Prevention does not need a confession first
For me there is an important stance in this: relief should not begin only once someone has proved they cannot go on. Leaders are allowed to act earlier. Not over someone's head, not paternalistically, but wherever they themselves carry responsibility for priorities, resources and how work is organised.
So when someone says for the third time that everything is fine while the reality of their work keeps tightening, the fourth response does not have to be an even better question. Sometimes the more useful question is: what can we take away right now?
Which structures produce this accumulation of small responsibilities is described in my article on strain architecture. What this looks like in my work with companies is on the relevant page.
Overload rarely comes from one single large task
It usually comes from the sum of many small responsibilities. The self-check lets you look at these patterns in your team more systematically.
Contact
Phone
Adress
Jungholzstrasse 16, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland
Unburnt by Cornelia Gürtler © 2026 – All rights reserved
Legal Notice – Terms and Conditions – Privacy Policy
Website by Individuelles Webdesign
